Category Archives: Transfer talk

Transitional season ahead as Levy padlocks the purse

Maybe the HP Touchpad fire sale taught Daniel Levy something in the last week: if you have stuff that no one wants then you have to practically give it away.  If Alan Hutton is the 16 gigabyte version (only available in white) -

This is a Luka Modric-free blog.

demanding a mere 3 million pounds for his poor application ecosystem – then the 6 million-rated Wilson Palacios is the overclocked, larger capacity hardware (as an aside, is David Bentley’s slow boot sequence the reason that he remains on the shelf?).

With just a day left to save Tottenham’s season, hard-negotiating chairman Levy is finally accepting that to save money you sometimes have to lose money, sanctioning transfers that represent a more than 50% mark down on the various purchase prices.  It’s perhaps harsh on Palacios, an inconsistent performer who signified a good performance with an obligatory yellow card.  His Tottenham career deteriorated in the aftermath of his brother’s tragic kidnap and murder in 2009.  But the 6 million pounds his transfer to Stoke looks likely to net is somewhere around the figure Spurs should have paid for him in the first place.  Levy paid too much.

He paid too much for Alan Hutton, a limited defender who spent his entire career in the Scottish league, and has amassed just 51 league games in three and a half seasons.  Nine million pounds…seriously.

David Bentley cost Levy about 17 million pounds and is now worth probably a third of that.  In fact Bentley may end up going on a free transfer at the end of his deal as nobody wants him.  His insipid loan spell at Birmingham last season hardly lit a fire under potential suitors and now he’s been mentioned as a make-weight in an attempt to bring Gary Cahill from Bolton.

Jermain Jenas came in for 7 million pounds with a growing reputation but has rarely convinced.  The 21st century Jason Dozzell may still manage to secure a fee around 4 or 5 million pounds because he’s under 30 and English.  But the fact that he’s linked with the Premier League lesser lights says it all.

Sebastian Bassong is another ordinary talent that Harry thought was worth a lot of money two years ago but is now also make-weight material.

And the punches keep coming.  Robbie Keane, Jermain Defoe, Peter Crouch: all returning to the club for big money, all signed by Harry Redknapp, all flops.  People keep making excuses for Defoe but enough is enough.  The guy had a few purple patches in seven seasons but he’s just not got the composure or intelligence to be a top class striker.  Levy lost big on Keane but he may be fortunate that Steve Bruce thinks Peter Crouch is worth about what Spurs paid for him.  For a 30-year-old who has managed just 12 league goals in 67 games, I’d buy him a train ticket to Sunderland (as opposed to driving him there myself – it’s a fairly long way).

Levy’s reluctance to give Redknapp money to spend is understandable.  Yes, he’s made some coin on the likes of Berbatov and Carrick but he’s been stung way too much in the past by trying to do the right thing and trust the judgement of the managers and their coaching teams.  With Redknapp probably in his last season (or even last months if his upcoming court case has fallout) this season may be transitional.  But it gives Levy a chance to push reset, trim the squad, get rid of the dead wood and prepare for a new incumbent…who I hope is Italian with silver hair.


The eighth best player of all time

While I was relieved that Tottenham’s £25m bid for Newcastle’s Andy Carroll was rejected, I was still dismayed that Harry Redknapp could think that the striker was worth a punt at that money.

Then along came Liverpool’s new owners, Fenway Sports Group, making demeaning ‘pfft’ sounds as they shoved ‘Arry out of the way and threw £35m at Newcastle (who hilariously rejected the offer at first).  Of course common sense took over as Newcastle owner Mike Ashley recalled that he had offered Carroll to Liverpool’s first team coach Steve Clarke for £1m while he was at West Ham.  Gift horse. Mouth.

Something feels a little impulsive about Fenway’s decision to spend such a huge amount of money on someone like Carroll.  Maybe the desire to appease and please the jaded Liverpool fans caused them to lose sight of reality a little; a bit like a guy who buys a girl an extravagant and inappropriate gift after just one date.  I mean eighteen months ago Carroll was the enthusiastic half of a comedy forward line with Shola Ameobi.  Now he’s the eighth most expensive transfer of all time.

Fans and pundits have been having fun with the numbers all day.  Carroll is Mesut Ozil+Sami Khedira+Van Der Vaart+Javier Hernandez.  Or 583 Seamus Colemans.

And the truth is that only time will tell if this remarkable transfer is value for money for Liverpool.  As Johnny Giles loves to say while giving his opinion: ‘We can only give our opinion, Bill.  We can only go by what we see on the pitch.’  And what we have seen on the pitch from Andy Carroll is a good five months in the Premier League with an average team and a relatively impressive England performance.  It’s not a lot to go on.

Yes, he’s got the physical attributes and can score goals.  But Dalglish should have concerns about his off-the-pitch behaviour with Carroll, at 22, guilty of nightclub fights, charged with assaulting an ex-girlfriend and breaking his team-mates jaw.  His name has also been splashed across the front pages with the words “cocaine” and “orgy” in close proximity.  His behaviour would lead any rational observer to conclude that Carroll is an out-of-control yob.

Three and a half seasons ago Liverpool spent £23m on, arguably, a world class talent.  The day they sold that world class talent on (at 100%-plus profit) they recruit a one-cap striker with 34 career goals (only 14 of those in the top flight).

The perceived absurdity of the transfer has pushed every other move in to the background.  Sure, the £50m for Torres is a lot of money but, on form, he’s one of the best strikers in the world.

The real David Ngog. Shit outta luck.

Liverpool’s other big money signing (for the same fee that they paid for Torres in 2007), Luis Suarez, has a great goalscoring record in the Netherlands.  But so too did Dirk Kuyt, Mateja Kežman and Afonso Alves.  Former Tottenham player Mounir El Hamdaoui has scored 96 goals in 178 Eredivisie games but was not deemed good enough to make a single appearance at White Hart Lane.  One wonders if Suarez will make the sort of impact that his fee suggests he should.

Conventional wisdom suggests that Liverpool’s return won’t be worth the £58m outlay (especially while they contrive to buy no wingers) but if they manage to salvage some pride from the season and qualify at least for the Europa League then their fans won’t give a toss.


Gallas is not a serial killer

I’m usually quite grounded when it comes to the tribal nature of football.  Crossing the Merseyside divide, traversing the North London battle lines or exchanging colours in Glasgow will usually earn you abuse from your former employer’s fans as well as a proportion of your new supporters.

As a Tottenham fan, having a former Arsenal player at White Hart Lane should be something relatively satisfying rather than something to get upset about.  William Gallas signed a one year deal this weekend with the greatest fear not being that he used to wear the red of Arsenal or blue of Chelsea but more that the 33 year old is over the hill and of questionable character.

The comparisons have been drawn to when Sol Campbell swapped London white for Arsenal red in 2001 but the two situations are almost polar opposite.  Campbell – 26 at the time of his move – spent the months leading up to his defection declaring that he would stay at Spurs and would never play for Arsenal.  Almost a decade on Campbell is still a reviled figure (perhaps the only way of removing the albatross now would be to rejoin Tottenham – as Teddy Sheringham and Robbie Keane would tell him).

Gallas is 33 and did not engineer a move to a rival in the same way that Campbell did.  He’s been a free agent for a while and the move is probably born out of convenience, the possibility of Champions League football, and a healthy contract.  The transfer is short-term and may not last beyond next summer.  Premier league-chasing Arsenal losing a dispensable player like Gallas is nowhere near comparable to a struggling Tottenham side losing their best player in 2001.

Thirty-three year old William Gallas has scowled and stomped his way through his English career.  After a solid career at Stamford Bridge he was left to furiously deny Chelsea’s accusation that he threatened to score own goals if he was refused a move to Arsenal in 2006.  It was hard to believe that an organisation of Chelsea’s standing would lie about something like that, a charge more believable when Gallas’ Gallic temperament is considered.  At Arsenal he courted further controversy by engaging in an on-pitch sit-down protest at the end of a 2-2 draw with Birmingham and in 2008 he was stripped of the Arsenal captaincy after criticising his younger team-mates.  Both clubs have also apparently baulked at his respective contract demands which led to him moving on in both cases.

So with Gallas’ temperament, loyalty, and current footballing ability under the microscope what about this whole “used to play for the Arsenal” thing?

Harry Redknapp admirably crushes this hang up in his own inimitable style:

It’s all cobblers. What’s he done? It’s not the Yorkshire Ripper I’m signing, is it? He’s a footballer, he plays football.


Hodgson has his targets right

Is a move for former England right-back Luke Young a sign of how far Liverpool have fallen or a sign that the consistent and respected defender is finally getting his just rewards?

If all goes to plan the former Tottenham and Charlton player will move from Aston Villa to Anfield for £2.5m – a sum that makes the £18m paid for Glen Johnson seem even more inflated now than it did a year ago.

Young would likely be brought in to play at left-back, a position he  successfully filled for Villa last season after an injury to first-choice Wilfred Bouma.  Even if Emilio Insua’s proposed move to Fiorentina doesn’t happen it’s unlikely that the Argentine would find himself back in the first-team at Anfield.

Hodgson has the right idea if Young and the recently-signed Joe Cole are an indication of his transfer policy.  Yes, Cole is a potentially expensive gamble if his fitness doesn’t hold up but he’s certainly a better free transfer signing than the likes of Maxi Rodriguez who his hard-up predecessor Rafa Benitez was forced to turn to last January.

Hodgson would probably like to sign the likes of Ashley Young and Kevin Doyle but financial woes mean that free transfers and cut-price players like (Luke) Young will have to suffice.  And the 62-year old is far too wise to blow his limited budget on players like Shaun Wright-Phillips or David Bentley who have failed to produce in recent years.

Hodgson might not be the man to bring the Premier League to Anfield but he will likely leave the club in a better position than which he found it.


O’Neill ready to stand up to Liverpool again

Martin O’Neill has said he will not take a Liverpool bid for his services lying down.  The Irishman was named as 6/4 favourite for the manager’s role at Anfield after Rafa Benitez left by mutual consent on Thursday.

But after rebuffing repeated attempts by Liverpool to sign his captain Gareth Barry in 2008 and 2009, O’Neill said he is once again ready to stand firm.

“I’ve heard the rumours but as of yet there has been no bid – and none will be welcomed either,” he said.  ”I have a contract at this club and remain an important part of the management team.”

Barry eventually left for Manchester City in 2009 for a sum of £12m – £8m less than the £20m that Villa had held out for twelve months earlier.

“I haven’t spoken to myself about it yet as I’m currently on holidays.  But as soon as I manage to reach me I will be telling myself how much I am wanted at this club.”


Tottenham transfer window round-up: “Meh”

In a blog earlier this week I bigged up Tottenham’s chances of netting Niko Kranjcar and Martin Petrov while nervously hoping that we’d avoid an ‘Arry brain-fart and sign David James.  Two from three ain’t bad.

Niko Kranjcar

£2.5m? Really?

Kranjcar was signed for a curiously small £2.5m while David James remained at Portsmouth as he was apparently not the subject of an “official” approach which is football talk for “‘Arry gave us a shout but we told ‘im to sling ‘is ‘ook”.

The talk of a move for Martin Petrov gathered pace all week but – depending on what you read – he either failed a medical, could not agree (70k per week) terms or the transfer was kyboshed by Chairman Daniel Levy.  The common view is that Petrov would have been a waste of money given the signing of Kranjcar but I’d argue that Tottenham are long-overdue a natural left-sided player for the left hand side of the pitch.  Having said that, if it was a straight choice between Kranjcar and Petrov, then the former represents the best value.

Perhaps most disappointing was the failure to get rid of David Bentley and, to a lesser extent, Jermaine Jenas.  In Bentley’s case I see no reason for him to still be at the club.

A year ago I wrote: “I have never got the David Bentley thing and was quite horrified when we spent a ludicrous amount of money on a player who can’t deliver a corner kick past the first defender.  He seems more obsessed with his tan and haircut than anything else and unlike Michael Carrick, we won’t be making a profit on this guy.

In Jermaine Jenas’ case we probably need him to make up the numbers but my list of disparaging comments over the years probably shows that I’ve remained consistent about the guy: (“Jermaine Jenas is not the right man for that job (and some might say any job)”, “Playing Jermaine Jenas there ranks, at best, as outright optimsm from Ramos/Poyet”, “…with Jermaine Jenas having yet another mediocre season”, “At Tottenham he seems particularly ordinary in just about every respect. He has no presence, can’t tackle, loses the ball too frequently and when he isn’t scoring there is not much else to his game”).  You get the point.

It’ll be a disappointment if Jenas comes back in to the team to play with Wilson Palacios when fit.  I’m not overly-convinced that Tom Huddlestone is dynamic enough for the top level but I’d still prefer him in the side to the serially disappointing JJ.

Overall it was a pity not to see a central playmaker come in alongside Kranjcar – unless he himself becomes that player when Luka Modric returns to fitness.



T-1 and counting: Tottenham transfer rumours

With one day left in the Premier League transfer window and Spurs losing Huerelho Gomes, Ledley King and Luka Modric to injury, it seems ‘Arry Redknapp will have to dip in to the transfer market a couple of times today or tomorrow.

Unsurprisingly he is rumoured to be returning to his former club Portsmouth for Niko Kranjcar and David James in an £8m double-bid. Kranjcar is a very tidy attacking midfielder who could be the playmaker that Tottenham desperately need in the centre of midfield. I have concerns with Modric playing in a central pairing given his lack of ‘presence’.  This, however, doesn’t address the glaring problem the club still has on the left but I’ll get to that.

David James is a clown and sadly I think if he comes to Spurs then he’ll retain the “number one shirt” even after Gomes returns to fitness.  Gomes is by no means perfect but he has improved immeasurably in the last 12 months.  I think he’s undoubtedly a better keeper than James but he won’t get a fair crack of the whip under Redknapp who will guarantee James a first team place.  Cudicini has looked very shaky in his limited outings since his signing so there is no doubt that Tottenham do need someone.

I should be more positive about the move to sign Martin Petrov for £3.5m from Manchester City.  He’s a natural left-sided player and is regarded for his pace and crossing.  He would certainly be an improvement on our other left-sided options even if I’m not overly-impressed with his contribution in a City shirt since his 2007 move.  My enduring memory of him is the red card he received for kicking Leon Osman in a league defeat to Everton last year and he’s also had his fair share of injury problems.  Providing we don’t pay him what he gets at City (rumoured to be £70k per week which may have played a factor in him turning down Spurs two years ago) then it seems a good deal.

The club have just announced a “link up” with Brazilian club Internacional and it was hoped that it may have helped Spurs land midfielder Sandro.  The media, however, are reporting that the bid has been turned down and Sandro will remain with Internacional.  I’ve never seen him play but I’m reliably informed that he’s rather good even if he may not have been ready for first team action yet.

Rafael van der Vaart won’t be joining Spurs it seems.  A player of his quality would have been a hell of a capture for Redknapp but according to Sky Sports he will be retained following the departure from Real Madrid of Wesley Sneijder and Arjen Robben last week.

Summary:

Petrov: Looks most likely

Kranjcar: Would be a good buy

James: Likely if he’s first choice

Sandro: Seemingly not

van der Vaart: highly unlikely


Something for nothing

The post-Bosman transfer system is a complete boon for those club chairman horrified by the wages that average players command these days.  With June 30th heralding the end of many Premier League contracts, here are some available players that might interest thrifty managers.

Jermaine Pennant (Right winger, released by Liverpool)

I’ve never quite understood the fuss surrounding Jermaine Pennant, another in a long line of young players that failed to realise their supposed (assumed?) potential. But, at the same time, he has spent nine of his ten footballing seasons playing for top four clubs Liverpool and Arsenal. Signed by Arsenal for £2m from Notts County when just 15, he appeared just 12 appearances in six seasons, making various loan moves to Watford, Birmingham and Leeds in that time. He is now a free agent after his Liverpool contract expired and you can be fairly certain that his days playing in the Champions League are now over. A drink-driving conviction for which he spent 30 days in jail and a conviction for public order offences means that Pennant is a potential liability and only likely to attract attention from the Premier League also-rans.

Possible destinations: Wolves, Bolton, Blackburn, Stoke.

Dietmar Hamann (Defensive midfielder, released by Manchester City)
At 35 one feels that Hamann’s top flight career might be over. He did a good job in Sven Goran Eriksson’s only season in charge of Manchester City but last year made just 9 appearances. The likes of Burnley and Wolves are unlikely to see a requiement for someone of his vintage given their relatively young squads, Hull have George Boateng in that defensive midfield position, Birmingham have Lee Carsley. A drop down to the Championship or a move back to Germany might be on the cards.

Possible destinations: Nottingham Forest, Leicster City, Ipswich Town.

Lucas Neill (Right back, released by West Ham)
Neill turned down a one year contract extension at West Ham, reportedly because he was asked to take a pay cut but possibly also because, at 31, he wanted a longer deal. He received a lot of criticism from fans in general after he chose the Hammers over Liverpool in 2007 with the general belief being that he went to Upton Park for the money. Blackburn fans have little time for him after he upped sticks and left aftersix seasons at Ewood Park. Leaving that aside, would he be an astute free transfer? The legs aren’t quite what they used to be but Neill is experienced and, on his day, can be formidable. He’s still capable of doing a job in the top half of the table but he might find a pay cut is facing him wherever he goes. Everton might like competition for Tony Hibbert and Portsmouth have just lost Glen Johnson.

Possible destinations: Everton, Portsmouth.

Henri Camara (Striker, released by Wigan)
I’m loathe to suggest Camara as a target but you know someone is going to go for it. The Senegalese international, now 32, has been something of a nomad since his controversial time at Wolves in 2004. He refused to play in the second tier after they suffered relegation and spent relatively unsuccessful loan spells with Celtic and Southampton. Wigan spent £3m on him in 2005 and while his 20 goals in 69 games was a reasonable return, he still found himself loaned to West Ham and Stoke without scoring for either. He has been relegated with Sedan, Wolves and Southampton so if he does stay in the Premier League it will probably be in a relegation scrap.

Possible destinations: Birmingham, Hull, West Brom.

Michael Owen (Striker, released by Newcastle)
For me, this is a no-brainer – if the contract is right. Owen, in spite of the spate of (preidctable) injuries suffered while at St James Park, still netted 26 times in 71 games. However, his performances at the tail end of last season were a sorry sight and it will be a shame if that’s what weighs on the mind of prospective employers as they look through his prospectus. I’m sure Owen does not feel all that motivated by reported interest from Stoke and Hull but he may be very interested in any interest from David Moyes and Everton. A boyhood Evertonian, the match seems perfect. He’s only 29 and if protected (in the same way that Spurs protect Ledley King) then he could do a great job for a club who are relatively skint.

Possible destinations: Everton.

Some wildcards

Radhi Jaidi (Central defender, released by Birmingham): Useful center-half. At 33, he might have a good year left in him for those in the bottom half of the table.

Andy van der Meyde (Right winger, released by Everton): Injuries blighted his four years at Everton but at 29 and a career that has taken him to Ajax and Inter, he finds himself of interest to Blackburn.

Lee Bowyer (Central midfielder, released by West Ham): A once-promising Leeds career collapsed to relative insignificance following the GBH trial of 2001. Stints at Newcastle and West Ham were only moderately successful and it seems he’ll sign with Birmingham where he spent the last six months of the season.


A critical eye on the latest transfer nonsense

First off we have some hyperbole from Carlos Tevez.

“I did not feel supported after they signed Berbatov…I gave my life for the Manchester United shirt”

No, clearly you didn’t.

Dimitar Berbatov has become a hate figure for many United fans, the Emmanuel Eboue of Old Trafford.  He’s going to feel the abuse more intensely next year after effectively running Tevez out of Old Trafford.  Most United fans would vouch for Tevez ahead of Berbatov but in terms of raw talent, Berbatov easily out-strips the Argentinian.

I remember watching Tevez in Man United’s FA Cup win over Tottenham earlier this year.  He put the Tottenham players to shame with an outstanding performance: chasing every ball, running around a lot, basically being an effective nuisance.  Sadly, these qualities will not sustain you in the big games – hence Tevez rarely appeared in them.

Irrespective of whether or not Berbatov is worth the money paid for him, for £25m needed to secure Tevez, you should expect a lot more.

Xabi Alonso looks set to leave Liverpool.

The Times reports: Liverpool placed a £35 million valuation on Xabi Alonso last night after the Spain midfield player said his goodbyes to some members of the club’s staff.”

When Alonso was reportedly priced at £14m last summer I thought it was an awful lot of money for a player who had just completed two unspectacular seasons.  His 2008/9 season was better … but £21m-worth better?  It’s an exorbitant amount of money but Rafa is the man who got £8m for Mohamed Sissoko.

Olivier Kapo doesn’t like Wigan

“I have a big craving to play in a club better than Wigan for me to blossom.”

Wigan have a craving to buy a player better than Kapo who may be worthy of more than 10 starts next season.

Samuel Eto’o is still a fine player but he appears set to give up ambition for a huge wad of cash at Manchester City.  At 28, he is banking on City actually breaking the Premier League top four next year to ensure he plays in the Champions League again before 30.  On the back of the recruitment of Shay Given, Roque Santa Cruz, Craig Bellamy and Wayne Bridge, one might question whether they are really of the class required to do so.

To fund the purchase of Eto’o, Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan (yes, I copied and pasted) is set to offload Darius Vassell.

Wait.  There’s more.  He’ll also have to sell Ched Evans, Tal Ben Haim, Javier Garrido, Felipe Caicedo, Dietar Hamann, Gelson Fernandes and Benjani.  Wow, that Sven Goran Eriksson thing really didn’t work out.

Also on the subject of Manchester City there are reports that they will launch bids for Everton’s Joleon Lescott and Arsenal’s Kolo Touré next week.  Few Arsenal fans will be that concerned considering that the fee mentioned is £12m for a 28 year old, he hasn’t been any good for a while and they’ve signed Thomas Vermaelen who is apparently a good defender and nice to his parents.

It’s more of a heartbreaker for Everton if the £15m bid finds favour with the Everton board and Lescott himself.  He’s been a bargain purchase who has only missed 8 games in three seasons, scored cruical goals, put in top notch performances and also filled in effectively at left-back.  Lescott is definitely the better buy here.

Finally, Blackburn manager Sam Allardyce thinks that a cold, northern shock is what Real Madrid striker Ruud vanRuuuuuud Nistelrooy needs.

“The sort of salary that Ruud would be on at Real Madrid may be beyond us, but if he wants to play in England again and take less of a salary, then we’d be interested.”

From Madrid to Blackburn.  Would this be the most extreme transfer since Richard & Judy went to Watch?


The Eleventh Hour

As the old block of cheese – which has been holding the transfer window open – gets chewed by some vermin, I’ve decided to have a look at some of the recent deals and evaluate what they might mean for the clubs involved.

Confirmed

Andriy Shevchenko (Chelsea – AC Milan, loan)

Well, that didn’t work.  Roman Abramovich paid £30m in 2006 for his close friend Shevchenko.  The Ukranian managed just 9 goals in 47 league games.  He returns to AC Milan (where he previously bagged 127 goals in 208 appearances) on an initial one-year loan.  But the question has to be asked as to whether or not he has lost the pace and finishing ability that made him one of the top strikers in Europe for several years.

Verdict: Chelsea cutting their losses, Milan have little to lose.  For Shevchenko, it might be the chance of another new beginning.

Anton Ferdinand (West Ham to Sunderland, £8m)

People can criticise this deal but it makes sense from Roy Keane and Sunderland’s point of view.  Ferdinand is by no means a top class defender but he’s capable and has the type of qualities that are lacking in Nyron Nosworthy, Danny Collins and Paul McShane.  Initially Keane wanted to pay about £6m for Tottenham’s Younes Kaboul.  But for an extra £2m he has a player who is far closer to the finished article – and that’s what a team battling to stay clear of relegation need.

Verdict: Both teams have done well here because the bid is generous.  The player has done well because he’s getting the 50k a week that West Ham wouldn’t pay him.  The only loser is the (soon-to-be-former) West Ham manager Alan Curbishley who had Ferdinand sold without his consent.

Keith Andrews (MK Dons to Blackburn, initial £750k)

This is almost as curious a deal as the pending Robbie Fowler one and despite Paul Ince making a good start as Blackburn boss, I would have to question whether the likes of Andrews (who is 28 next month) have the ability to make the step up the Premier League.  He has pedigree at the lower levels as club captain of the MK Dons, winner of the League Two Player of the Year Award and capturing a place in the PFA Team of the Year.  Ince managed him at the Dons and played with him at Wolves.

Verdict: It’s a slightly baffling deal as he doesn’t have youth on his side nor does his history suggest he’ll be anything other than a hard-working journeyman struggling to stand out. Great experience for him though and good luck to him.

Shaun Wright-Phillips (Chelsea to Man City, £8.5m)

A return to Manchester City for Shaun Wright-Phillips three years after his £21m departure the other way, has to be filed as the second monumental failure for Chelsea’s transfer policy this week.  Chief executive Peter Kenyon has occasionally re-iterated the club’s target of being self-sufficient by 2010.  The loss of Shevchenko and Wright-Phillips for a combined £8.5m fee this week (Shevchenko’s eventual permanent transfer is unlikely to generate much money) is a lot less than the £51m outlay on them in 2005/6.

For Wright-Phillips it’s a chance to press reset after a disappointing Chelsea career.  While, at 26, he is unlikley to reach the highs that were once expected of him in his early days, he is a decent, energetic player who will give the City team some extra impetus.  Will this signal the end of Vedran Corluka’s Man City career for the same fee to Tottenham?

Verdict: Chelsea got rid of a player who contributed little except a hole in the balance sheet.  City get a good value for money first-team player.

James Milner (Newcastle to Aston Villa, £12m)

He’s 22 years of age, has commanded £15.6m in transfer fees, played 175 league games and made a record number of England U21 appearances.  He made his Leeds debut in 2002 aged 16.  Two years later he moved to Newcastle where he enjoyed an increasing appreciation from pundits and fans.  He signs this week for the club he joined on loan in 2005 although eyebrows might be raised at the fee.  Newcastle lose one of their most effective players and Villa spend big once again on a young British talent.  Where does he rank in that food chain at Villa?  Well, somewhere between Ashley Young and Nigel Reo-Coker is the answer to that question.

Verdict: Milner probably has more chance of UEFA cup football at Villa but Newcastle have done quite well out of it – if they can buy a couple of decent players for the money.

Roman Pavlyuchenko (Spartak Moscow to Tottenham, £12m)

It didn’t seem that manager Juande Ramos had Pavlyuchenko at the top of the list but needs determined that he tie up the deal for the Russian marksman who netted an impressive 77 goals in 147 games for Spartak Moscow.  He scored twice to contribue to England’s demise in the Euro 2008 qualifiers and then netted three times in an impressive showing at the tournament proper.  Should be noted that there weren’t really many other suitors though.

Verdict: In the end Spurs did ok to get the guy for £12m as I thought the fee was going to be more towards the £15m mark.  Looks a good player but, as always, success will depend on how the player adapts to the Premier League.  Perhaps he will turn out to be as much of a bargain as Dimitar Berbatov was (see below).

It might happen

Dimitar Berbatov (Tottenham to Man United, £25m)

The transfer that has been rumoured from about 8 months after Berbatov signed for Tottenham.  He’s eager to go, United need him and Tottenham will lose their best player but make a £15m in two years on a 28 year old.  Berbatov is an incredible talent with a questionable attitude.  When all is well, he’s great.  When the chips are down, he sulks.  Would Ferguson stand for it?  No.  But if Berbatov behaves like that and ends up out in the cold, he’s only himself to blame.

Verdict: I’d be very surprised if this didn’t happen although it may hinge on Tottenham signing a second striker to partner Roman Pavluychenko.  The fee is fair for the talent they are getting and I really can’t understand what United’s fussing is all about.  They paid £18m for Carrick for crisskae!

Frazier Campbell (Man United to Hull, £7m)

If Hull were trying to sell the transfer to Campbell they could have done better than get thrashed 5-0 at home by Wigan this weekend.  I saw Campbell against Newcastle and he looked ok.  But his pedigree is impressive; 21 goals in 33 appearances for Royal Antwerp (mind you Dong Fangzhuo scored 34 in two seasons for Antwerp before he arrived) and then 15 last season while on loan to Hull.  He’s 20, long way to go.  But can he do it in the Premiership?

Verdict: Hull know they need a goalscorer.  Most teams that go down often have few goalscorers exceeding 5 in a season.  If Campbell could hit double figures for them then it could be the difference between sinking or swimming.  It’s a gamble and it looks about £3m or so above his realistic value.  United probably won’t use him that much anyway this season so it’s a great deal for them, especially if they put in a sell-on clause.

Albert Riera (Espanyol to Liverpool, £12m)

Liverpool are set to nick right-winger Riera from their neighbours Everton in a hefty £12m deal this weekend.  Riera would be known to Premier League fans from a largely forgettable stint at Manchester City where he made 15 appearances.  His form for Espanyol has been impressive although he is not renowned as a goalscorer.

Verdict: I haven’t seen Riera for Espanyol but he was pretty mince for Manchester City which has to be considered relevant.  Rafa’s transfer record outside of Fernando Torres is erratic but if Riera is more Agger than Gonzales then it will be money well spent.  At 6′ 2″, Riera might have the physical presence to succeed were the slight Gonzales (who has been a success at Real Betis) didn’t.

Robinho (Real Madrid to Chelsea, £32m)

There was much expected of Robinho when he signed for Real Madrid in 2005 for about $30m.  But his form has been indifferent in spite of his 25 goals in 101 appearances for the club.  Chelsea are sniffing around and quite fancy some Ronaldo-type skills on their left-wing.  They are thought to have bid £23m – way short of the £32m that President Ramon Calderon wants.

Verdict: Robinho is itching to get away from Madrid for whatever reason.  He’s not guaranteed his place and probably sees the Chelsea left-wing battle with Florent Malouda as a bit of a forgone conclusion.  He’s a top notch player when he’s on his game so Chelsea should just try and flog Malouda (who is brutal) for about £9m and add it on to the £23m they’ve already offered.  Or just send Malouda in a box to Madrid with the cheque.

Some comedy characters - including Florent Malouda

Some comedy characters - including Florent Malouda


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 541 other followers