Unfortunate timing or consequence of action?

While it might seem unfortunate timing for Liverpool that one of their fans has been arrested over alleged racist abuse, there are bound to be arguments that the club’s behaviour over the past couple of months fueled the situation.  The staunch defence of Luis Suarez – a player who admitted to and was found guilty of using racist language – split the fan base.

Liverpool were fully entitled to defend their player but a blatant disregard for the sensitivities of the case flew in the face of everything that the famous club has stood for.  From the egregious statements, explicit criticism of Patrice Evra and the FA, strong hints of a conspiracy against Liverpool (the same organization that has previously been accused of conspiracies against just about every top club in England – can you be prejudiced against everybody??) and, of course, the immensely inappropriate t-shirts, Liverpool have made a complete balls of this.

The club have been so blinkered and ignorant about the issue that their statement even contained complete inaccuracies, wrongly claiming that Patrice Evra has previously made claims of racism.  It’s well documented that he hasn’t.

The nauseating picture of Suarez parading around grinning, wearing a shirt with a picture of himself on it is as Spinal Tap as this situation could get.  Any amount of self-awareness would have told the Uruguayan that he was going to face a public backlash over it.  But even if he wasn’t wise enough (or cared enough) to see that he was completely out of touch with reality, the club should never have sanctioned what was a vulgar display of arrogance.

Liverpool have painted themselves as the victims here, invoking a siege mentality and working some of their supporters up in to a frothy frenzy of injustice.  Even if this lamentable action on Friday night is completely unrelated, the public and media will draw inevitable conclusions.  The consequences of Liverpool’s actions might have only just begun and I think some day we’ll get an admission that they handled the matter all wrong.


Who is United’s biggest asset?

Is Wayne Rooney set to join Paul McGrath, Norman Whiteside, Jaap Stam, David Beckham, Roy Keane and Carlos Tevez in the discarded pile? That’s what today’s Independent is suggesting.

It follows a difficult 15 months in his relationship with manager Alex Ferguson. Rooney flirted covertley with Manchester City in late 2010 following a reported fall out with Ferguson. After supposedly making it clear he would not sign a new deal he did just that within days … and secured a pay rise.

Over Christmas he was fined and dropped after going out for dinner with teammates following the 5-0 win against Wigan. Despite not breaking any club rules the club’s coaching staff said that Rooney (along with his co-conspirators Darron Gibson (yes, he still exists) and Jonny Evans) was not performing to an acceptable level at training.

Rooney returned in the 3-0 defeat at Newcastle but was largely ineffective and was substituted. The forward is regarded as one of the most talented players of his generation but is dogged by on-field misdemeanors and fits of pique. He is due to serve a two match ban at Euro 2012 for a needless red card in the final qualifying game against Montenegro. His attitude and body language are frequently questioned and has even attracted attention for aggressive responses on Twitter to a goading follower.

Rooney and United have issued a joint statement already to say it’s nonsense but it seems that things are not right between player and club. Most of those moved on by Ferguson have been expendable (even if Paul McGrath undermined Fergie’s lack of faith with a seven year stint at Aston Villa and top class performances at two World Cups).  But Rooney, yet to really reach his peak as a professional footballer, occupies a talismanic place in United folklore.  Only David Beckham – sold at 28 – could claim to have been sold unwillingly while at his zenith.

United need Rooney, perhaps more than Rooney needs them.  He could walk in to any team in the world.  I’m sure Jose Mourinho would make him a mainstay at the Bernabeu and Roberto Mancini would probably be happy to replace Tevez with the United number ten.

So the question is, what serves United best?  A future without Rooney?  Or a future without Ferguson?


Better a nearly season than a nothing season

1986/87 – the David Pleat year, five in midfield, 49 goals for Clive, semi-finals, finals and replays, and Diamond Lights. But it all went wrong. Within a few months Pleat was gone (possibly off to start his degree in “Mispronouncing Footballer’s Names”) and Tottenham graduated to financial difficulty and 20 years of mediocrity.

That was very much the “nearly season”.  And while only a fan as pessimistic as me could declare that 2011/12 is set to be yet another, I’d rather have a nearly season than a nothing season.

While fans of other clubs are fondly recalling the goals that won league titles or Champions Leagues, the likes of me is forlorn over the last minute Gudni Bergsson equalizer that cost Tottenham second place in December 1995, speechless at Ian Walker’s gormless grin after a crap Steve McManaman shot hit a divot and trickled past him in 1996 and demoralized following Allan Nielsen’s humorous tapping of his wrist after his 90th minute consolation in a 1-7 defeat to Newcastle.

The 90s were utterly dire for Tottenham, the first half of the last decade not really that much better.  Rival fans loved to laugh – and why shouldn’t they.  Big spending Spurs were embarrassing themselves again whether it was losing 6-1 to Bolton or giving Stuart Nethercott 50 games.

But for all the complaints I’ve had about Harry Redknapp, he’s certainly managed to stitch a good outfit together.  While Chelsea spend £50m on Torres, United pony up £34m for Anderson and Carrick (ironically both pony), Liverpool splash £85m on Henderson, Downing and Carroll and Man City spend hundreds of millions on their first team, the Tottenham team that beat West Brom this week was put together for about £60m.

Just three league defeats (two of which were against the top two and suffered without the considerable presence of Scott Parker and Emmanuel Adebayor) have silenced the critics for now and the season is not looking as transitional as it seemed it might be.

While the players and ‘Arry have to play the game and suggest they are in the title race, it would take incompetence of the highest level for Mancini not to bring the trophy to Eastlands.

The media have been jumping on the top club’s bad results (crisis! pressure!) only a week later to flip 180 after a good win (back in the title hunt!).  It’s reactive and illogical but it gets people angry and accumulates page hits (used to be that it sold papers but no one buys those things any more).  Spurs are one defeat away from the same treatment but that defeat doesn’t change the reality and likelihood any more than a win does.

There are only two teams who ever really had a chance this season.  Chelsea are too old and in transition, Arsenal lack quality and Liverpool have a good manager who bought the wrong players.  Tottenham sit somewhere in the middle – quality in key areas but without the experience and touch of class that the two Manchester clubs have to call on.  Even if I wasn’t a Tottenham fan I’d love to see them in the hunt just to bring something a little different in to the mix.

But we all know what will happen when they take on Everton on January 11th hoping to record the win that puts them second with Man United – the recently re-signed Steven Pienaar will knock home a 90th minute equalizer for Moyes’ side.


Transitional season ahead as Levy padlocks the purse

Maybe the HP Touchpad fire sale taught Daniel Levy something in the last week: if you have stuff that no one wants then you have to practically give it away.  If Alan Hutton is the 16 gigabyte version (only available in white) -

This is a Luka Modric-free blog.

demanding a mere 3 million pounds for his poor application ecosystem – then the 6 million-rated Wilson Palacios is the overclocked, larger capacity hardware (as an aside, is David Bentley’s slow boot sequence the reason that he remains on the shelf?).

With just a day left to save Tottenham’s season, hard-negotiating chairman Levy is finally accepting that to save money you sometimes have to lose money, sanctioning transfers that represent a more than 50% mark down on the various purchase prices.  It’s perhaps harsh on Palacios, an inconsistent performer who signified a good performance with an obligatory yellow card.  His Tottenham career deteriorated in the aftermath of his brother’s tragic kidnap and murder in 2009.  But the 6 million pounds his transfer to Stoke looks likely to net is somewhere around the figure Spurs should have paid for him in the first place.  Levy paid too much.

He paid too much for Alan Hutton, a limited defender who spent his entire career in the Scottish league, and has amassed just 51 league games in three and a half seasons.  Nine million pounds…seriously.

David Bentley cost Levy about 17 million pounds and is now worth probably a third of that.  In fact Bentley may end up going on a free transfer at the end of his deal as nobody wants him.  His insipid loan spell at Birmingham last season hardly lit a fire under potential suitors and now he’s been mentioned as a make-weight in an attempt to bring Gary Cahill from Bolton.

Jermain Jenas came in for 7 million pounds with a growing reputation but has rarely convinced.  The 21st century Jason Dozzell may still manage to secure a fee around 4 or 5 million pounds because he’s under 30 and English.  But the fact that he’s linked with the Premier League lesser lights says it all.

Sebastian Bassong is another ordinary talent that Harry thought was worth a lot of money two years ago but is now also make-weight material.

And the punches keep coming.  Robbie Keane, Jermain Defoe, Peter Crouch: all returning to the club for big money, all signed by Harry Redknapp, all flops.  People keep making excuses for Defoe but enough is enough.  The guy had a few purple patches in seven seasons but he’s just not got the composure or intelligence to be a top class striker.  Levy lost big on Keane but he may be fortunate that Steve Bruce thinks Peter Crouch is worth about what Spurs paid for him.  For a 30-year-old who has managed just 12 league goals in 67 games, I’d buy him a train ticket to Sunderland (as opposed to driving him there myself – it’s a fairly long way).

Levy’s reluctance to give Redknapp money to spend is understandable.  Yes, he’s made some coin on the likes of Berbatov and Carrick but he’s been stung way too much in the past by trying to do the right thing and trust the judgement of the managers and their coaching teams.  With Redknapp probably in his last season (or even last months if his upcoming court case has fallout) this season may be transitional.  But it gives Levy a chance to push reset, trim the squad, get rid of the dead wood and prepare for a new incumbent…who I hope is Italian with silver hair.


Hey Luka, let’s take a walk

Hey Luka, let’s take a walk

Bit embarrassing for Spurs to see the phrase ‘Levy threatened me’ in the headlines today.  Luka Modric insists that not only has Spurs chairman Daniel Levy reneged on an agreement to consider any bid from a “bigger club”, but he also “threatened” to leave Modric in the stands or on the bench if he causes any trouble.  It brings to mind an image of a maniacal, trench coat-wearing Levy pointing a baseball bat at poor little Luka as he cowers in the corner in the new Spurs away kit.

I covered the topic before about how everyone shared a little bit of blame for this situation.  Modric and his agent may have asked for a minimum fee release clause when negotiating their new contract 12 months ago and were met with this reported verbal counter-offer from Levy.  Naive on their part to accept this – but then again they were happy at the time with the improved terms, signing-on fee and agent cut, no doubt.

Nevertheless, it looks like the damage is done and Spurs have little choice now but to move Modric on.  The bid, of course, is a joke.  When you consider that Manchester United paid £18m for a far inferior player five years ago, Spurs need to hold out for close to double that – or for a smaller amount and perhaps Drogba or Sturridge in exchange.  Personally I’d take both strikers with some cash.

What a Jonny

Probably made up, but some sites are reporting that Spurs want to take Northern Ireland international Jonny Evans from Old Trafford. Evans is an average player who was accidentally overrated as a result of looking competent while playing alongside top class players.  Anyone can have a good half-season (see Bentley, David) but the last 12 months has not been kind to Evans.  If he stays then he’ll probably become the new Wes Brown, filling in for unimportant games and the occasional appearance at right back.

While I’m at it can I nail my colours to the mast and say that I’m not buying in to this Danny Welbeck thing.  He’s someone who could end up having a decent Premier League career but it won’t be at Old Trafford (see Higginbotham, Danny or Campbell, Frazier).  I feel sorry for young players who have a couple of good games for United because they are instantly elevated way above their station.  For the record I see more potential in Federico Macheda although, like Giuseppi Rossi, he may make his name abroad.

Defending Liverpool

£16m or £20m, it's still a lot of money for Henderson.

I tend to delve in to the Football365 mailbox to find out what the fans are thinking and those of Liverpool have been vigorously defending their clubs transfer policy in recent days.

There is some scoffing from other team’s fans at the money paid for Jordan Henderson, Andy Carroll, the signing of Charlie Adam and the targeting of Stewart Downing.  One of the defences from Merseyside is that the £7-8m paid for Charlie Adam compares very favourably to the figure that Manchester United paid for Michael Carrick five years ago or that Fergie’s bit-part midfielder Anderson cost more than Jordan Henderson or that the purported £19m fee for Downing is not far off what Antonio Valencia cost United a few years ago.

But the comparisons don’t make much sense.  In the last Deloitte football finance report, United were shown to generate an annual revenue exceeding Liverpool’s by £100m.   Another year away from the Champions League means that the gap will only get wider.  Just because the Old Trafford club overpay for a player like Valencia or Anderson bears no relation to what Liverpool are doing.  After all, United could bring Garry Birtles out of retirement, pay him five million a year and still win the title.


Media coverage of Arsenal is fair game

Arsenal fans are a bit sick and tired of being on the back pages it seems.  This morning’s Football365 mailbox page publishes a missive from Gary (from Ireland – shocker) lamenting the number of letters being published that relate to the Arsenal circus in the last week.

The current state of play is that Gael Clichy (who wasn’t good enough according to Arsenal fans – probably fair comment) has gone to Manchester City, Cesc Fabregas is probably on his way to Barcelona shortly and Samir Nasri is on the open market with just 12 months of his contract remaining.

Meanwhile, as if to rub salt in the wounds, lots of deadwood (purchased, it should be pointed out, by the manager many fans are defending) remains.  No one seems to want to pay £10m+ for Nicklas Bendtner, Denilson is not

Funny that Arsenal only became invincible when they loaned Jeffers back to Everton

moving to AC Milan, Tomáš Rosický wants to stay at Arsenal and “achieve something” (a shot on target?), Sébastien Squillaci is not very good, Andrei Arshavin’s 15 minutes are up and Emmanuel Eboué….well, I got nothing.

Every squad has players who are out of form or just haven’t made the level.  Arsenal are no different and perhaps listing the underachievers above like that gives the impression that Arsenal are some sort rubbish tip for sub-standard players.  They’re not.  They showed last season that, when on form, they are a match for anyone.

But they are undermined by problems in defence, problems caused by their esteemed manager who has neglected the goalkeeper and back four for too long.  Sure, they’ve been unfortunate with injuries but when you’re in the Champions League every year and have one of the biggest grounds in the United Kingdom, you should be able to reinforce your squad with enough quality players to get through all but the worst crisis.

Yet even if Nasri and Fabregas leave, Arsenal should still be able to compete for the title.  Fabregas was disappointing last season and Nasri went off the boil after Christmas.  In my view their star players are still there – Thomas Vermaelen, Jack Wilshere and Robin van Persie.  While the transfer sagas rumble on in the background, maybe this should be the alternative narrative, something that a journalist with a little conviction can push on a jaded Arsenal fan base.

But at the same time I’m not sure Arsenal fans can complain that the fact a quarter of their first team wants to leave is such big news.  Seven years ago the media was full of effusive praise for ‘The Invincibles”, the Arsenal side that went 49 games unbeaten over 2003 and 2004.  The thought was that this team would go on to dominate the Premier League and the fans rode this wave of optimism with the same belief.

Yet within a couple of seasons their key players (Thierry Henry, Ashley Cole, Patrick Vieira) had moved on and Arsenal have now gone six full seasons without a trophy.  How many Arsenal fans wrote to Football365.com to say they were sick of reading the positive wall-to-wall coverage about their record-breaking team?  How many pointed out that, in fact, the media were over-reacting and that the likelihood was that the club would only win an FA Cup between now and 2011?

Probably somewhere about ‘none’.  Suck it up Arsenal fans and enjoy what will probably be another competitive season.


Tottenham may be out of Luk-a.

I’m a little surprised that Luka Modric has felt compelled to try and worm his way out of Tottenham.  All evidence suggests that he’s a decent little chap, not hugely motivated by money in a Carlos Tevez-type way and, at a still-relatively young age, has plenty of time to make his mark in world football.

But his blabbing to the Daily Mail on Friday was hugely disappointing.

“Chelsea are a big club with an ambitious owner.  They have great players and they have ambitions to fight for the title and win the Champions League.  I want to leave Tottenham as friends. I have enjoyed my time there, but now it is right for me to look at another club.  I have an arrangement with the chairman. When I signed my new contract, he said that, if another club came to sign me, they would consider the offer.”

He kind of looks like a more floppy-haired Peter Crouch here.

If Luka is genuinely unhappy then Spurs would risk unsettling the squad if they forced him to stick around.  Just look at the Berbatov mess from 2008.  Cesc Fabregas and Barcelona flirt with each other every year, but the almost-guaranteed Champions League football and the persuasive Professor manage to convince Cesc to stick around for just one more year.

Spurs don’t really have an equivalent persuasion.  You think Modric can be lured by Europa League games against Sligo Rovers or the promise of some jellied eels from ‘Arry?

So who’s to blame the most for what could become an unseemly squabble this summer?

Luka

To hear the little man signed a six year deal on £40k a week was a surprise.  Didn’t he think that wasn’t a great deal of money in the scheme of things?  I mean Robbie Keane – a player Tottenham have been trying to offload for two years – is reportedly on £60k a week.  Ok Luka’s made an unsubstantiated claim that Levy promised to entertain any bids for him but if it’s not written in to the contract that it’s not worth the paper it’s not written on.  I know in the real world of football, players and agents are happy to sign the contracts knowing that they can simply request a move and cause a ruckus if it’s not granted.

But I have little sympathy for a player who willingly signs a long-term deal that makes them a millionaire and then shows total disdain for the fans that – and yes I’m going to say it – pays his wages.  Does the contract have a get-out clause if Spurs fail to finish in the top four or if a bid of £30m comes in?  If not then shame on you and your agent.  I mean you signed it twelve months ago.

Luka definitely deserves a pay rise but what’s the point in, say, doubling his wages when Chelsea can triple them.

‘Arry

Perhaps if ‘Arry had guided Spurs in to the top four then there would be nothing to discuss.  I’ve cut Redknapp some slack in the last year or so because, you know, fair play, he has achieved something.  But when you can’t beat flipping West Ham, Birmingham, Wolves, Wigan and Blackpool then you deserve criticism.  The standard last year was brutal yet Spurs made a total mess of it.  And I’m sure Luka is looking at Redknapp’s squad building (basically the signing of some fairly old people) and thinking ‘we haven’t got any chance next season’.

Levy

Daniel has come out with his usual ‘not for sale at any price’ quote (pretty sure he said that about Berbatov).  While he has no choice but to say that, it does of course leave him somewhat exposed: Chelsea raise their bid, Luka and his agent dig their heels in, he relents.  Everyone has a price and it’s ridiculous to suggest they don’t.  But it’s a rock/hard place scenario for him.  He can’t signal an intent to sell as that will fuel Luka’s conviction to go.  He’s probably trying to buy some time while he figures out if Luka can be sweet-talked in to staying for another twelve months, perhaps on the back of a renegotiated contract with a release clause.  But if that doesn’t happen then he’s going to look a bit silly.

The media

Nothing we can do about it.  They want stories so players have to be unsettled in order to get those stories.  There’s only so much interest in Wayne Rooney’s transplant or Jack Rodwell’s insanity.  They’re doing their job and they do it without any fear of reprisal (apart from maybe being banned by Fergie for asking a polite question).  Nothing has to be substantiated and they answer to nobody.  It’s insane.  Once the Modric thing is done and dusted, they’ll start offering Gareth Bale to Inter.

Everybody’s got a price

I say that every player has his price and Chelsea seem to think it’s £22m.  Well they probably don’t but it’s as good a place to start as any.  Harry made the humorous comparison to Jordan Henderson – the curiously expensive transfer from Sunderland to Liverpool – suggesting, indirectly, that he’s not fit to lace Luka’s boots.  A bit vulgar and unfair perhaps, but it underlines what just about everyone at Spurs probably thinks.  You spend £16.5m on a player, a player that is then widely regarded as one of the best midfielders in the league, you expect to make some serious money on him.

If Modric does go I expect it will be for about £30-35m.  Do I think he’s worth it?  To Spurs, yes.  To someone else, probably not.  He’s a lovely footballer but he’s not a match-winner.  He doesn’t score goals and he usually plays too deep to open up defences.  Now perhaps he can adapt to a more forward role but that’s an unknown.

If Spurs do get that sort of money for him then they would have to take it.  Let’s just hope ‘Arry doesn’t pull “another” masterstroke and replace him with that tortoise, Carrick.


Tottenham’s travails are no great surprise

About 12 months ago, in the wake of securing Champions League football for Tottenham, I made the declaration that it was time for Harry Redknapp to step down.  The reason?  Because it just could not get any better than where he was at.

Of course it was never going to happen.  No other manager in that situation would have contemplated it and I don’t blame Harry for taking on the challenge of leading Tottenham in to the Champions League.

And what we got was a largely successful campaign that I won’t go over ad nauseam.  In spite of OTF (other team’s fans) trying their damnedest to belittle the achievement, Spurs went to the quarter-finals and did what Jermain Defoe said they would do.

But the last few months has been atrocious, so much so that rumblings amongst some fans suggest that it’s time to get shot of the manager.  Recent results arguably have shown that, in fact, Harry is a stop gap who won’t lead the club to the next level.

Howler Gomes: At least his eyes are open

I dissected his achievements earlier this year and was very generous in my praise while trying to honestly appraise the help and good fortune he’s had along the way.

Now that the team will probably miss out on Champions League football (and I realise an unlikely win at Eastlands could make me look like an idiot in a week) and could fall as far as sixth place, questions need to be asked.

This is the poorest quality Premier League that I can remember.  An only-occasionally impressive Manchester United look to have sewn up the title today.  But they’ve been helped by Chelsea’s diabolical mid-season run, Arsenal’s lack of maturity and cutting edge, the noisy neighbour’s erratic form and Liverpool’s lack of quality.  Seventy points secured Champions League qualification last year.  This year it could be 65 although it’s likely to be less.

The list of teams that Spurs have dropped points against is embarrassing: Wigan (won 1 point out of 6), West Ham (1/6), West Brom (2/6), Blackpool (1/6).  Five points out of 24 against struggling sides is nowhere near good enough and it shows the fundamental problem with Harry’s team (I won’t get in to the four goal thrashings that knocked us out of three different tournaments).  Forget the Michael Dawson handballs and red cards, the Heurelho Gomes howlers and the paltry return from the strikers.  Tottenham’s inability to defend and compete against dogged teams has contributed greatly to this season’s failure.

Harry can do what other under pressure managers do and project the blame on to the supporters and their “heightened expectations”.  But that’s the business you’re in, Harry.

If he wants to take on another 12 months at Spurs (and I think he should if only to punish those that could not see this coming a long time ago) then he’ll need to make some big decisions.  The goalkeeper has to go, the right-back position needs filling, the centre of midfield needs an overhaul and two new strikers are required.  Peter Crouch is the only striker I’d keep, if only to offer the faint suggestion of a Plan B from the bench while Kyle Walker – impressive on loan at Aston Villa – should be moulded in to our first choice right-full.

The midfield situation will be difficult as something’s gonna have to give.  Maybe Harry will cash in on Luka Modric or, more likely, Rafael van der Vaart. It could be that one of the wingers will go (Aaron Lennon was left out of the starting line up yesterday) and the crud that’s filling up the bench (Jermaine Jenas and Everton’s former linchpin-cum-mediocrity Steven Pienaar jump to mind) will move on.

But Harry’s problem is the perception of his reign now – fifth (or sixth) place will be seen as relative failure and his chances of becoming England manager will recede further next season if Tottenham are still labouring outside the top four and failing to beat Premier League also rans.

Does he decide that he needs a year off while he campaigns to be the next England manager?  Or does he try to repair the damage at Tottenham and push for the top four one last time before leaving for the national job?

With Manchester City likely to spend a hundred million plus in the summer and Liverpool revitalised under Kenny Dalglish and with new financial backing, Spurs are more likely to be fighting Sunderland, Everton and Bolton for sixth place.  Could the golden era be over already?


The eighth best player of all time

While I was relieved that Tottenham’s £25m bid for Newcastle’s Andy Carroll was rejected, I was still dismayed that Harry Redknapp could think that the striker was worth a punt at that money.

Then along came Liverpool’s new owners, Fenway Sports Group, making demeaning ‘pfft’ sounds as they shoved ‘Arry out of the way and threw £35m at Newcastle (who hilariously rejected the offer at first).  Of course common sense took over as Newcastle owner Mike Ashley recalled that he had offered Carroll to Liverpool’s first team coach Steve Clarke for £1m while he was at West Ham.  Gift horse. Mouth.

Something feels a little impulsive about Fenway’s decision to spend such a huge amount of money on someone like Carroll.  Maybe the desire to appease and please the jaded Liverpool fans caused them to lose sight of reality a little; a bit like a guy who buys a girl an extravagant and inappropriate gift after just one date.  I mean eighteen months ago Carroll was the enthusiastic half of a comedy forward line with Shola Ameobi.  Now he’s the eighth most expensive transfer of all time.

Fans and pundits have been having fun with the numbers all day.  Carroll is Mesut Ozil+Sami Khedira+Van Der Vaart+Javier Hernandez.  Or 583 Seamus Colemans.

And the truth is that only time will tell if this remarkable transfer is value for money for Liverpool.  As Johnny Giles loves to say while giving his opinion: ‘We can only give our opinion, Bill.  We can only go by what we see on the pitch.’  And what we have seen on the pitch from Andy Carroll is a good five months in the Premier League with an average team and a relatively impressive England performance.  It’s not a lot to go on.

Yes, he’s got the physical attributes and can score goals.  But Dalglish should have concerns about his off-the-pitch behaviour with Carroll, at 22, guilty of nightclub fights, charged with assaulting an ex-girlfriend and breaking his team-mates jaw.  His name has also been splashed across the front pages with the words “cocaine” and “orgy” in close proximity.  His behaviour would lead any rational observer to conclude that Carroll is an out-of-control yob.

Three and a half seasons ago Liverpool spent £23m on, arguably, a world class talent.  The day they sold that world class talent on (at 100%-plus profit) they recruit a one-cap striker with 34 career goals (only 14 of those in the top flight).

The perceived absurdity of the transfer has pushed every other move in to the background.  Sure, the £50m for Torres is a lot of money but, on form, he’s one of the best strikers in the world.

The real David Ngog. Shit outta luck.

Liverpool’s other big money signing (for the same fee that they paid for Torres in 2007), Luis Suarez, has a great goalscoring record in the Netherlands.  But so too did Dirk Kuyt, Mateja Kežman and Afonso Alves.  Former Tottenham player Mounir El Hamdaoui has scored 96 goals in 178 Eredivisie games but was not deemed good enough to make a single appearance at White Hart Lane.  One wonders if Suarez will make the sort of impact that his fee suggests he should.

Conventional wisdom suggests that Liverpool’s return won’t be worth the £58m outlay (especially while they contrive to buy no wingers) but if they manage to salvage some pride from the season and qualify at least for the Europa League then their fans won’t give a toss.


A powder puff team in the powder-blue kit

The fingers may point accusingly at Michael Dawson following his fifteen minute horror performance against Fulham this afternoon.

But the seeds for the 0-4 thrashing (and the margin of victory was harsh on Fulham) were sown by Harry Redknapp’s game plan.  On paper the Spurs personnel looked strong – only Sandro has lacked playing time this season – but they were set up in a way that ensured key players had minimal impact.

It was a bad day to experiment with playing a right-winger on the left (Aaron Lennon), a ‘second striker’ on the right (van der Vaart) and Steven Pienaar (5′ 7″) alongside Luka Modric (5’8″) in the middle, supporting lone striker Jermain Defoe (5’7″).  It was like Redknapp used “Ask to Pick” on Football Manager and selected the groundsman’s assistant from a drop down list.

It was also a bad day for Fulham to come over all Barcelona; playing at a high-tempo and pressing high up the pitch.

And it was a completely inappropriate time for Tottenham to start knocking the ball around their own half, looking to build from the back but only conspiring to lose possession almost every time.  The game plan looked to be set around giving the ball to Modric 30 yards out, having him draw Fulham up the pitch while attempting to feed the midfielders, with full backs offering support on the overlap.  The truth is it never looked like working with Lennon and van der Vaart looking uncomfortable and Fulham easily winning back the ball in midfield.

There was something deeply unsettling about the attitude of the Spurs players from the off.  If the FA Cup is supposed to be undergoing a revival this year no one told the team in the uninspiring powder-blue kit.  They were languid, lacking urgency and, save for ten minutes at the beginning of the second half, completely outplayed.

We often see struggling teams raise their game (Wolves and West Ham over Christmas and New Year for example) only for them to crash to a thumping defeat the next week.  But Fulham look a very nice outfit indeed with Clint Dempsey and Moussa Dembélé putting in stellar performances alongside battle-hardened veterans like Danny Murphy and the impressive Damien Duff.  Tottenham had no answer and looked as poor and clueless as they did at the very depths of Juande Ramos and Martin Jol’s reigns.

Redknapp bemoaned the lack of movement in the transfer market in a post-match interview, using that resigned tone of voice that connects with the common man (“Nah, we ain’t got nuffin’ goin’ on”).  There’s urgency about the next 24 hours now as Robbie Keane has moved on loan to the Hammers so a new striker has become a priority - especially given the dire goal-scoring form of Peter Crouch and Defoe.  Reports suggest that Atlético Madrid have rejected a staggering £38.5m bid from Spurs for Sergio Agüero while Newcastle last week rejected a pretty outrageous £23m bid for Andy Carroll (something tells me they will regret not getting shot of Carroll while he’s in vogue).

And with the injuries and suspensions piling up in defence, Redknapp may try again for Phil Neville at Everton.  Or he might go one step further and giver Vedran Corluka a game?  You think?  An interesting 24 hours ahead in the transfer market tomorrow.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 542 other followers